Intimate-partner framing
Output framed as the creator being in a romantic or domestic relationship with the requester.
Why this line exists
Output framed as the creator being in a relationship with the requester is the category most closely tied to the unhealthy-attachment problem, and it is the one creators most often want closed even when they permit other adult categories.
How a request is matched to it
Possessive and relationship-claiming phrasings directed at the requester.
Matching is deterministic and anchored to word boundaries, so a term inside a longer innocent word does not fire. The matched term is returned in the refusal, which means a creator can see why their rule caught something and a requester can see what to change.
Whether creators permit it
Only by explicit permission. Creators who permit it commonly pair it with a hard session cap rather than the default nudge.
Questions
- Can a creator permit intimate-partner framing?
- Only by explicit permission. Creators who permit it commonly pair it with a hard session cap rather than the default nudge.
- What happens to a request that breaches it?
- It is refused before any model is called, with the rule name and the matched term quoted back. The refusal is recorded in the creator's audit log. It is never rewritten into something permitted.
- Does the API enforce this too?
- Yes — the licensed-likeness API and the MCP server call the same evaluation the website calls. There is one implementation of the consent gate, so an automated integration cannot get a weaker check than a browser.